Home Releases # 11, volume 2, 2017

POTENTIAL OF THE CONCEPT “FRAMING” FOR COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS

Linguistics , UDC: 81’22

Authors

  • Andreeva Svetlana Candidate of Philology, associate professor

Annotation

Cybernetics and linguistic direction in the theory of frames, established through the development of artificial intelligence, has formed a “static” approach to understanding and describing frames in linguistics. At the same time, other social sciences and the humanities studied the frame’s behavioral matrix to a greater extent in order to be able to predict the development of social processes and behavioral practices of various social groups. Within the framework of the latter direction, the frame was considered as a process of purposeful structuring of reality in the minds of the masses, i.e. in dynamics. Sociology, social and political psychology use the term “framing” to descried the process and the method of frame analysis. The author of the article draws attention to some aspects of the study of framing, which will not only be productive for cognitive linguistics, but also expand the understanding of the scope of the frame in verbal and non-verbal communication, especially in the framework of studying the structuring of reality in the influential types of speech. The “behavioral” part of such mental formations as the frame, concept, and concept sphere can be reconstructed using the propositional frame analysis. This will allow not only to formalize an interdisciplinary research zone of cognitive structures, but also to present it in logical categories accessible to linguistics.

How to link insert

Andreeva, S. . (2017). POTENTIAL OF THE CONCEPT “FRAMING” FOR COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", # 11, volume 2, 2017,
References
1. Vakhshtain V.S. Teoriya freimov kak instrument sociologicheskogo analiza povsednevnogo mira: avtoref. dis. … kand. sotsiol. nauk. Moscow: GU–VShE, 2007. 35 s.
2. Vakhshtain V.S. Sociologiya povsednevnosti i teoriya freimov. Sankt-Petersburg: Izd-vo Evropeiskogo un-ta, 2011. S. 42 – 43. 
3. Gofman I. Analiz freimov: Esse ob organizacii povsednevnogo opyta / Per. s angl. R.E. Bumagina, Yu.A. Danilova, A.D. Kovaleva, O.A. Oberemko pod red G.S. Batygina i L.A. Kozlovoi. Moscow: Institut sotsiologii RAN; FOM, 2003. 752 s.
4. Gumbol’dt V. fon. O razlichii stroeniya chelovecheskikh yazykov i ego vliyanii na dukhovnoe razvitie chelovechestva // Izbrannye trudy po yazykoznaniyu. Moscow: Progress, 1984. S. 37–298.
5. Gumbol’dt V. fon. Yazyk i filosofiya kul’tury. Moscow: Progress, 1985. 452 s.
6. Dal’ V. Tolkovyi slovar’ zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka: V 4 t. Moscow: Gos. izd-vo inostr. i nac. slovarei, 1955. T. 4. 683 s. 
7. Dem’yankov V.Z. Paradigma v lingvistike i teoriya yazyka // Gorizonty sovremennoi lingvistiki: Tradicii i novatorstvo: Sb. v chest’ E. S. Kubryakovoi / Otv. red. N.K. Ryabtseva. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul’tur, 2009. (Studia philologica). S. 27–37.
8. Efremov V.A. Teoriya kontsepta i kontseptual’noe prostranstvo // Izvestiya RGPU im. A.I. Gercena. 2009. № 104. S. 96–106. 
9. Kravchenko A.V. O tradiciyakh, yazykoznanii i kognitivnom podkhode // Gorizonty sovremennoi lingvistiki: Tradicii i novatorstvo: Sb. v chest’ E.S. Kubryakovoi / Otv. red. N.K. Ryabtseva. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul’tur, 2009. (Studia philologica). S. 51–65.
10. Kubryakova E.S. Yazyk i znanie: Na puti polucheniya znanii o yazyke: Chasti rechi s kognitivnoi tochki zreniya. Rol’ yazyka v poznanii mira. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury, 2004. 560 s.
11. Lingvisticheskii enciklopedicheskii slovar’ / Gl. red. V.I. Yarceva. Moscow: Sov. enciklopediya, 1990. 685 s.
12. Luriya A.R. Yazyk i soznanie / Pod red. E.D. Khomskoi. Moscow: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta, 1979. 320 s.
13. Minskii M. Freimy dlya predstavleniya znanii. M.: Energiya, 1979. 151 s.
14. Psikhologicheskii slovar’ / Sost. D. Trefilov, V. Nikonov [Elektronnyi resurs] Psikhologi na b17.ru URL: www.b17.ru/dic/simprakticheskoe_obschestvo/ 
15. Romanov V.N. Istoricheskoe razvitie kultury (psikhologo-tipologicheskii aspekt). Moscow: Savin. 2003. 448 s. 
16. Teliya V.I. Russkaya frazeologiya. Semanticheskii, pragmaticheskii i lingvokul’turologicheskii aspety. Moscow: Shkola «Yazyki russkoi kul’tury»,1996. 288 s.
17. Fillmor Ch. Freimy i semantika ponimaniya // Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike. 1988. Vol. 23. Kognitivnye aspekty yazyka: Per. s angl. / Sost., red., vstup. st. V.V. Petrova i V.I. Gerasimova. Moscow: Progress, 1988. S. 52–91.
18. Yanou D., Khul’st M. van. Freimy politicheskogo: ot freim-analiza k analizu freimirovaniya // Sociologicheskoe obozrenie. T. 10. № 1–2. 2011. S. 87–113.
19. Bateson G. Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1972. 373 p.
20. Jackendoff R. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1999. 283 p.
21. Rein M., Schön D.A. Problem setting in policy research // Using social research in public policy making / Ed. by C.H. Weiss. Lexington: Lexington Books, 1977. P. 235–251.
Download file .pdf 134.81 kb