Home → Releases → # 6, 2011 →

CATEGORY OF DEFINITENESS / INDEFINITENESS AND THE FORM OF THE ADJECTIVES NAMING A MATERIAL IN THE CHURCH SLAVONIC AND LITHUANIAN LANGUAGES (HISTORICAL ASPECT)

Linguistics

Authors

  • Vlasova Svetlana PhD in Philology

Annotation

In this article the adjectives with the meaning of a material and substance of which a thing is made are considered from the comparative and historical aspects. The research is based on the material of the Church Slavonic language of the 12th–13th centuries and the Lithuanian language. The capacity of the given adjectives to the formation of nominal and pronominal forms is analyzed as well as their connection with the category of defi niteness / indefi niteness. The connection of these forms with the lexical meaning of the adjective is also discussed in the article. The development of these adjectives in the languages is specifi c: they retained their short forms longer than other relative adjectives in the Old Russian language and had opposition of forms in the Lithuanian language a long time before that, though they lost this capacity later, having acquired some other word-formation suffi x.
Tags:
category of defi niteness / indefi niteness , relative adjectives , the category of definiteness / indefiniteness , the Church Slavonic language , the Lithuanian language , Uspensky codex of the 12th–13th centuries

How to link insert

Vlasova, S. . (2011). CATEGORY OF DEFINITENESS / INDEFINITENESS AND THE FORM OF THE ADJECTIVES NAMING A MATERIAL IN THE CHURCH SLAVONIC AND LITHUANIAN LANGUAGES (HISTORICAL ASPECT) Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", # 6, 2011,
References
1. Balalykina E. A. The role of comparative-historical method in the study of adjectival word formation in related languages Э. A. Balalykina // Uchenye zapiski Kazan University. Series: the humanities. - 2005. - Tom. 147, cl. 2. - P. 11-22.
2. Balalykina E. A. To a question about importance of Lithuanian language for researches in the field of Russian language history. / E. A. Balalykina // Scientific notes of Kazan University. Series: humanities. sciences. - 2009. - Vol. 151, p. 6. - P. 50-59
3. Vlasova S. The role of definiteness/indeterminacy category in the development of the adjective in Old Russian and Lithuanian С. Vlasova. // Acta Baltico Slavica. - Warszawa, Instytut Slawistyki Polskiej Akademii Nauk. - 2006a. - № 30 - С.181-198.
4. Vlasova S. Adjective forms as a means of expressing the category Definiteness/indeterminacy in the Church Slavonic language (on the material of the Assumption book of the XII-XIII centuries) / S. Vlasova. - Vilnius: Vilniaus pedagoginio universiteto leidykla, 2006b. - 210 p.
5. Kuznetsov A. M. Short and full adjectival forms in business and everyday life monuments of North-Western Rus XI-XIV cc. А. M. Kuznetsov. / / Vestn. Moscow Univ. Ser. 9. Philology. no. 4, 1983. - С. 46-53.
6. Kuznetsov A. M. Assimilation of Church Slavonic nominal and partitive forms The Russian scribes of XI-XII centuries / A. M. Kuznetsov. // Functions and interaction of linguistic units in the text: Proceedings of the Ninth Autumn Seminar, Arbavera, October 11-13. 1997г. - Tallinn, 2000, TPU. - С. 95-104.
7. Kuznetsov A. M. Historical Grammar of the Old Russian Language. Ed. by V.B.Krysko. B. Krys'ko. VOL. III. A. M. Kuznetsov, S. I. Iordanidi, В. B. Krysko. Adjectives. Moscow: Azbukovnik, 2006. - 496 с.
8. Zinkevichyus Z. P. Some questions of pronoun adjectives in Lithuanian / Z.P. Zinkevichyus // Voprosy Zinkevichyus / / Voprosy of Slavic linguistics. - Moscow, vol. 3, 1958. - С. 50-100.
9. Tolstoj N. I. Meaning of short and full adjective forms in Meaning of the short and full adjective forms in Old Slavic language / N. I. Tolstoj // Voprosy Slavic Linguistics, Vol. Languages, vol. 2. - Moscow, 1957. - С. 43-122.
10. Uryson E. V. Relative adjective in the paradigm of the Old Russian name (On the material of the Assumption book of the XII - XIII centuries). / Е. V. Uryson. // Ancient Russian Language. Lexicology and lexicography. - Moscow, 1980. - С. 110-132.
11. The Collection of the Assumption of the XII-XIII centuries. Ed. by O. A. Knyazevskaya et al. - Moscow, 1971. - 751 с.
12. Yakubinskiy L.P. History of the Old Russian Language. / by L.P.Yakubinskiy. - Moscow, 1953.
13. Ambrazas S. Būdvardžių darybos raida / S. Ambrazas. / Sudarė D. Mikulėnienė. – Vilnius: Lietuvių kalbos institutas, 2011. – 272 p.
14. Holvoet A., Tamulionienė A. Apibrėžtumo kategorija / A. Holvoet, A. Tamulionienė // Daiktavardinio junginio tyrimai / Red. A. Holvoet, R. Mikulskas. – Vilnius: Lietuvių kalbos institutas, 2006. – P.11 –32.
15. Mikulskas R. Apibrėžiamųjų būdvardžių aprašo perspektyva / R. Mikulskas // Daiktavardinio junginio tyrimai / Red. A. Holvoet, R. Mikulskas. – Vilnius: Lietuvių kalbos institutas, 2006. – P. 33–65.
16. Spraunienė B. Paprastųjų ir įvardžiuotinių būdvardžių opozicij a lietuvių kalboje kaip apibrėžtumo sistema / B. Spraunienė. // Acta Linguistica Lithuanica. – 2008, t. 59. – P. 109–139
17. Valeckienė A. Dabartinės lietuvių kalbos įvardžiuotinių būdvardžių vartojimas / A. Valeckienė // Literatūra ir kalba. – 1957, t. 2. – P. 159– 355
Download file .pdf 367.89 kb