Authors
- Garipova Gulchira Doctor of Philology, Associate Professor
Annotation
Russian Russian and Uzbek literatures of the second half of the twentieth century are considered in the article, national bestial mythocodes associated with Russian and Eastern religious and philosophical systems are identified, the problems of symbolization of werewolf world images built on the principle of “transformed form” are analyzed, semantic aspects of the semantics of “possible worlds” are identified. The analytical emphasis is placed on an attempt to identify the specifics of mythological imagery when creating a bestial ambivalent hero, in which the principle of a combinatorial combination of the level “discordia concors” (harmonious discord) and “concordia discors” (uncoordinated harmony) is implemented. The analysis involves the works of writers of Russian literature - the fairy tale novel by A. Kim “Squirrel”, the novels by D. Lipskerov “The Last Dream of the Mind” and V. Pelevin “The Sacred Book of the Werewolf”; Uzbek literature - the novel by T. Pulatov “The Turtle Tarazi”.
How to link insert
Garipova, G. . (2022). NATIONAL MYTHOCODES OF WEREWOLF EXISTENCE IN RUSSIAN AND UZBEK PROSE Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 16, 2022, 71-90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25688/2619-0656.2022.16.04
References
1.
Kafka F. (1989). Izbrannoe [Selected works]. Moscow: Raduga. 576 p.
2.
Kim A.A. (1984). Belka: roman-skazka [Squirrel: a fairy tale novel]. Moscow: Sov. pisatel’. 271 p. URL: http://www.litra.ru/fullwork/get/woid/00019501189525253794/page/1 (accessed: 15.02.2018).
3.
Pelevin V.O. (2011). Svyashchennaya kniga oborotnya: roman [The Sacred Book of the Werewolf: a Novel]. Moscow: Eksmo. 384 p.
4.
Pulatov T. (1991). Izbrannye proizvedeniya: v 2 t. T. 2 [Selected works]. Tashkent: Izd-vo lit. i iskusstva. 496 p.
5.
Bart R. (1989). Izbrannye raboty. Semiotika. Poetika [Selected works. Semiotics. Poetics]. Moscow: Progress. 616 p
6.
Bocharov A. (1991). Prevrashchenie zhizni [Transformation of life]. In: Pulatov T. Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Selected works]: v 2 t. T. 1. Tashkent: Izd-vo lit. I iskusstva. Pp. 3–16.
7.
Vorob’eva A.N. (2009). Russkaya antiutopiya 20 — nachala 21 vekov v kontekste mirovoj antiutopii [Russian dystopia of the 20th — early 21 h st centuries in the context of world dystopia]: dis. ... d-ra filol. nauk: 10.01.01. Saratov. 528 p. URL: http://www.dslib.net/russkaja-literatura/russkaja-antiutopij a-hh-nachala-hhi-vekov-vkontekste-mirovoj-antiutopii.html (accessed: 15.02.2018).
8.
Garipova G.T. (2021). Principy miromodelirovaniya v russkoj proze 21 veka (neklassicheskaya paradigma hudozhestvennosti) [World Modeling Principles in Russian Prose of the 20th century (Non-Classical Artistic Paradigm)]: dis. ... d-ra fi lol. nauk: 10.01.01. Vladimir. 612 p.
9.
Zamanskaya V.V. (2001). Ekzistencial’nyj tip hudozhestvennogo soznaniya v 20 veke [Existential type of artistic consciousness in the 20th century]. In: h Nauka o literature v 20 veke (Istoriya, metodologiya, literaturnyj process): Sb. st. Moscow: INION RAN. Pp. 194–212.
10.
Izvedat’ dorogi i puti pravednyh. Pekhlevijskie nazidatel’nye teksty (1991) [To explore the roads and paths of the righteous. Pahlavi edifying texts]. Vvedenie, transkripciya tekstov, perevod, kommentarij i glossarij O.M. Chunakovoj. Moscow: Glavnaya redakciya vostochnoj literatury “Nauka”. 192 p.
11.
Kassirer E. (2002). Filosofiya simvolicheskih form [Philosophy of symbolic forms]. T. 2. Mifologicheskoe myshlenie. Moscow; Sankt-Peterburg: Universitetskaya kniga. 280 p.
12.
Mamardashvili M.K. Prevrashchenie formy. [Form transformation] URL: http://rumagic.com/ru_zar/sci_philosophy/mamardashvili/6/j0.html (accessed: 23.03.2019).
13.
Meletinskij E.M. (2018). Mif i istoricheskaya poetika: Izbrannyj stat’i. Vospominaniya [Myth and historical poetics: Selected articles. Memories]. Moscow: RGGU. 693 p.
14.
Neronov I.V. (2015). Teoriya vozmozhnyh mirov literatury: predposylki sozdaniya, osnovnye zadachi i podhod k hudozhestvennomu miru literaturnogo proizvedeniya [The theory of possible worlds of literature: prerequisites for creation, main tasks and approach to the artistic world of a literary work]. In: Social’nye i gumanitarnye znaniya. № 4. Pp. 277–283.
15.
Neupokoeva I.G. (1975). O ponyatii obshchego tipologicheskogo ryada [About the concept of a general typological series]. In: Kontekst–1974. Moscow: Nauka. Pp. 157–182.
16.
Papilova E.V. (2011). Imagologiya kak gumanitarnaya disciplina [Imagology as a humanitarian discipline]. In: Rhema. Rhema. № 4. Pp. 31–40.
17.
Solnceva N. (1985). Vse nachinalos’ s proisshestviya [It all started with an accident]. Literaturnoe obozrenie. № 11. Pp. 48–51.
18.
Chesnov Ya.V. (2007). Telesnost’ cheloveka: filosofsko-antropologicheskoe ponimanie [Human Physicality: philosophical and anthropological understanding]. Moscow: IF RAN. 213 p.
19.
Shajtanov I. (2011). Komparativistika i / ili poetika [Comparative studies and / or poetics]. In: Problemy sovremennoj komparativistiki. Moscow: Zhurnal “Voprosy literatury”. Pp. 49–55.
20.
Shafranskaya E.F. (2002). Roman T. Tolstoj “Kys’” glazami uchitelya i uchenika: mifologicheskaya koncepciya romana [T. Tolstoy’s novel “Kys” through the eyes of a teacher and a student: the mythological concept of the novel]. In: Russkaya slovesnost’. № 1. Pp. 36–41.
21.
Shafranskaya E.F. (2020). Sovremennaya russkaya literatura: inoetnokul’turnaya problematika [Modern Russian Literature: foreign cultural issues]: uchebnik dlya vuzov. Moscow: Yurajt. 194 p.