Home Releases # 14. 2020

COGNITIVE BASES OF VERBAL METONYMY IN THE REPRESENTATION OF SPEECH ACTS

Linguistics , UDC: 81ʹ37 DOI: 10.25688/2619-0656.2020.14.11

Authors

  • Chaplin Evgeny
  • Suleimanova Olga Doctor of Philology, Professor

Annotation

Verbs of speaking represent a complex linguistic entity, characterizing external substantial aspects of the utterance, communicative side of speech, interaction between the speaker and the listener, emotional state and attitude of the speaker, etc. The core of this class of predicates are the verbs to speak/to say, which are the prototypical speech activity verbs and the general designation of a speech act. Besides, there are a number of metonymic verbs of speaking that contain “additional” information in their meaning and represent various characteristics of a speech act accompanying the speech act, the additional accompanying feature representing the whole speech act. These are the following verbs mumble, gnaw, mutter, babble, spatter, bark, lisp, etc. The paper provides an overview of approaches to verb metonymy in cognitive linguistics. The authors analyze the current state of affairs in linguistic interpretation of metonymic verbs of speaking in a natural language. What makes the research relevant is that it focuses on the verb as the primary sentence element which organizes the sentence. The research shows that the interest in the study of metonymic transfers of both nouns and verbs is steadily increasing. The metonymy is getting related to the mental processes and overall human cognitive activity that underlie metonymic transfers and explain how metonymy works when conceptualizing the reality. The verbal metonymy, following the principle of linguistic economy, demonstrates a tendency to the economy of the speaker’s efforts, e.g.: metonymical representation of a speech act by the verb mumble versus speak languidly and slurredly. The reviewed approaches to the classification of a metonymic transfer in the meaning of the verb, built on the division of metonymy into collegiate, causal, circumstantial, make it possible to identify the main metonymic transfer patterns in the meaning of speech verbs, the patterns being determined by the features of the speech act they represent. As the basic type of verbal metonymy, the study distinguishes circumstantial metonymy, formed by the relationship between the action and the accompanying acoustic, visual, behavioral and other characteristics, where the accompanying sign represents the whole action. The article introduces a comprehensive research procedure based on a hypothesis-deductive method, with semantic experiment as its integral part, and the research results verification using search engines. The study of the meanings of the verbs lepetat’ and lopotat’ allowed the author to put forward a hypothesis about the differential features that distinguish the meanings of the verbs of speaking. The result of the study is a more strict and complete semantic description of the verbs under study.

How to link insert

Chaplin, E. . & Suleimanova, O. . (2020). COGNITIVE BASES OF VERBAL METONYMY IN THE REPRESENTATION OF SPEECH ACTS Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", # 14. 2020, 164-181. https://doi.org/10.25688/2619-0656.2020.14.11
References
1. Ageeva N. G. Tipologiya i mekhanizmy glagolnoj metonimii v sovremennom anglijskom yazyke: Dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. Kiev, 1990. 199 s.
2. Anashkina E. V. Mehanizmy funkcionalnoj kategorizacii glagolov pri metonimicheskom perenose v angloyazychnom khudozhestvennom diskurse // Teoriya i praktika obshestvennogo razvitiya. 2011. No 8. S. 370–373.
3. Lakoff Dzh., Dzhonson M. Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem / Per. s angl.; pod red. i s predisl. A. N. Baranova. Moskva: Editorial URSS, 2004. 256 s.
4. Novikov A. L., Rybakov M. A. Semantiko-slovoobrazovatelnaya priroda metonimii v russkom yazyke // Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Lingvistika. 2011. No 3. S. 63–69.
5. Novikov A. L. Taksonomiya metonimii v russkom yazyke. Imena prilagatelnye. Glagoly // Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Ser.: Lingvistika. 2003. No 4. S. 61–66.
6. Seliverstova O. N., Sulejmanova O. A. Eksperiment v semantike // Kontensivnye aspekty yazyka: konstantnost i variativnost: Sb. st. k yubileyu O. A. Sulejmanovoj / Otv. red. T. D. Shabanova. Moskva: Flinta, 2016. S. 19–42.
7. Solodilova I. A. Metonimiya: granicy fenomena // Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2017. No 1. S. 53–57.
8. Sternin I. A., Shalamova E. V. Associativnyj eksperiment i opisanie semantiki slova v yazykovom soznanii (slovo mashina v slovare i yazykovom soznanii sovremennogo nositelya russkogo yazyka) // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika. 2016. No 2. S. 69−74.
9. Sulejmanova O. A. i dr. Grammaticheskie aspekty perevoda: Ucheb. posobie dlya stud. filol. i lingv. fak. vuzov. Moskva: Akademiya, 2010. 240 s.
10. Sulejmanova O. A., Beklemesheva N. N. Osnovy yazykovoj kategorizacii mira: prostranstvo, vremya, prichinnost i princip nesluchajnoj svyazi // Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. 2009. No 3 (7). S. 87–92.
11. Sulejmanova O. A., Fomina M. A. Triangulyacionnyj podkhod v eksperimentalnoj lingvistike // Rusistika i komparativistika: Nauchnye trudy po filologii / Gl. red. S. A. Vasilev. Vyp. XII. Moskva: Knigodel, 2018. S. 220–235.
12. Tolmacheva V. A. Metonimiya kak mehanizm formirovaniya glagolov s vtorichnym znacheniem “govorenie” // Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka. Vyp. XXXIII. 2018. S. 146–151.
13. Chaplin E. V. Metonimiya i metafora v sfere predikata (na primere glagolov govoreniya) // Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Ser.: Filologiya. Teoriya yazyka. Yazykovoe obrazovanie. No 3 (35). 2019a. S. 100–106.
14. Chaplin E. V. Rechevoj portret govoryashego: issledovanie semantiki metonimichnyh i metaforichnyh glagolov govoreniya // Chelovek v informacionnom prostranstve: Sbornik nauchnyh statej; Yaroslavl, 14–16 noyabrya 2019 g. / Pod obsh. red. T. P. Kuranovoj. Yaroslavl: RIO YaGPU. 2019b. S. 77–82.
15. Chaplin E. V. Gipotetiko-deduktivnyj metod dlya opisaniya metonimii v sfere glagolov govoreniya // Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki. T. 12. Vyp. 11. 2019v. S. 381–386.
16. Shmelev D. N. Sovremennyj russkij yazyk. Leksika. Moskva: Prosveshenie, 1977. 335 s.
17. Metonymy in language and thought / Ed. by K.-U. Panther, G. Radden. Amsterdam — Philadelphia: J. Benjamins, 1999. 423 p.
18. Benczes R., Barcelona A., Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez F. J. (eds.). Defining metonymy in сognitive linguistics: Towards a consensus view. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2011. 292 p.
19. BTS — Bol’shoj tolkovyj slovar’ russkogo yazyka / Pod red. S. A. Kuznetsova. Sankt-Peterburg: Norint, 2000 1536 s. URL: https://gufo.me/dict/kuznetsov.
20. Nacional’nyj korpus russkogo yazyka URL: http://www.ruscorpora.ru.
21. Karta slov i vyrazhenij russkogo yazyka URL: https://kartaslov.ru/.
Download file .pdf 112.65 kb