Authors
- Mikhalenko Natalia Candidate of Philology
Annotation
The modernist works of V.Y. Bryusov had a strong influence on the literary works of A.V. Chayanov. In his letter to Chayanov Bryusov gave a brief review of his poetry collection Lyolya’s book (1912) in which he called the first experiments of the young economist “brisk” and “cute jokes”. In the “Journey of my Brother Alexei to the Peasant Utopia Country” (1920) by Chayanov and the “Star Sorrow” (1895) by Bryusov similar characters and images are portrayed creating a utopian society of augurs of the spirit and bringing out strong promethean motives. The theme of duality developed in Bryusov’s poems and stories was also reflected in Chayanov’s novel “Venetian mirror...” (1922) which textually and by its plot is close to the story “In the mirror” (1902–1906) by Bryusov. But while Chayanov’s character experiences a kind of transformation, Bryusov rather described a psychopathology.
How to link insert
Mikhalenko, N. . (2017). THE INFLUENCE OF THE STORY “IN THE MIRROR” BY V.Y. BRYSOV ON A.V. CHAYANOV’S NOVEL “VENETIAN MIRROR OR BIZARRE ADVENTURES OF A GLASS MAN” Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", # 11, volume 2, 2017,
References
1.
Bryusov V.Ya. V zerkale // Bryusov V. Zemnaya os’. Rasskazy i dramaticheskie sceny. 3-e izdanie. Moskva: Knigoizdatel’stvo “Skorpion”, 1911. S. 13–23.
2.
Vulis А. Literaturnye zerkala. Moskva: Sovetskij pisatel’, 1991. 480 s.
3.
Gerasimov I.V. Dusha cheloveka perekhodnogo vremeni: Sluchaj Aleksandra Chayanova. Kazan’: ANNA, 1997. 192 s.
4.
Mikhalenko N.V. Vliyanie lichnosti i tvorchestva P.P. Muratova na khudozhestvennye proizvedeniya A.V. Chayanova // “Svoj” vs “Drugoj” v kul’ture emigracii: sb. st. / red. A.A. Danilevskij, S.N. Docenko. Moskva: FLINTA: Nauka, 2018. S. 56–69.
5.
Murav’yov V.B. Tvorecz moskovskoj gofmaniady // Chayanov А. Moskovskaya gofmaniada / Posleslovie V.B. Murav’yova; primechaniya V.B. Murav’yova, S.B. Frolovoj. Moskva: Izdatel’skij Dom TONCHU, 2006. S. 275–302.
6.
Propp V.Ya. Istoricheskie korni volshebnoj skazki. Moskva: Labirint, 2000. 336 s.
7.
Titova N.B. Strukturnye osobennosti kategorii dvojnika (na primere proizvedenij O. Uajl’da) // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. 2010. № 4(2). S. 955–957 URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/strukturnye-osobennosti-kategorii-dvoynika-na-primere-proizvedeniy-o-uaylda.
8.
Frezer D. Zolotaya vetv’. Moskva: Politizdat, 1980. 832 s.
9.
Chayanov A.V. Venecianskoe zerkalo, ili Dikovinnye pokhozhdeniya steklyannogo cheloveka // Chayanov A.V. Moskovskaya gofmaniada / Posleslovie V.B. Murav’yova; primechaniya V.B. Murav’yova, S.B. Frolovoj. Moskva: Izdatel’skij Dom TONCHU, 2006. S. 114–138.
10.
Chayanov A.V. Lyolina knizhka // Chayanov A.V. Moskovskaya gofmaniada / Posleslovie V.B. Murav’yova; primechaniya V.B. Murav’yova, S.B. Frolovoj. Moskva: Izdatel’skij Dom TONCHU, 2006. S. 9–34.