Home Releases

RUSSIAN LITERATURE IN THE 18th CENTURY IN PURSUIT OF HARMONY (A SYSTEMATIC STUDY)

Literary Сriticism , UDC: 821.161.1(091)(075.8)

Authors

  • Pashkurov Aleksey Doctor of Philology, Professor

Annotation

The paper studies literary culture of the 18th century in Russia within the framework of transitional periods in history and culture. Literary culture is viewed as the focus on dialectical controversies giving impetus to cultural, historic and societal development. The data analysis drawn on prior studies gives evidence to suggest that the specifics of literary culture becomes most explicit at a time of transitional periods with moral and aesthetic values changing rapidly along with a certain crisis in people’s reflections on history and contemporary life. Phenomena and processes embedded in the literary culture uncover two interrelated aspects. On the one hand, there is an apparent drift towards contrasts and clashes which is best seen during the watershed and transitional periods. Detailed analysis brings to light conflicting pairs based on the unity and struggle of the opposites principle. On the other hand, the ultimate goal of the literary culture is to suggest ways to coordinate and harmonize these clashes. From this perspective prominence should be given to the literary culture of the 18th century which opens the era of modern time in Russia. Then the paper provides a comprehensive analysis and review of contemporary western Slavistics’ views on the controversies in Russia’s literary culture of that time. The first subject area is represented by works which look into transition in the Russian literary culture of the 18th century by defining its mainstream and marginal elements. The second cluster of works focuses on the overall trends in the transition of epochs and the turning points. The third area of research relates to psychological and philosophic aspects which are intertwined with creative work. The forth subject area features views on transition patterns through genre interconnections within the literary process itself. Ultimately, when it comes to dialectics of controversies which push the literary culture forward during a transitional period western researchers turn to the central issue of changing philosophic and literary ideologems. Then we provide arguments to support the dominant role of a conflict between sense and sensibility in literary groups in Russia between 1690 and 1810: a drift from Barocco to pre-Romanticism. It was determined that the role of literary culture as a unifying ground during the transitional periods is facilitated by ideology, which in the 18th century revolved around the dynamic correlation between the notions of Duty and Virtue. Duty and Virtue determine the correlation between external (state and ideological) and internal (psychological) facets to the literary culture in the era of modern time in Russia. Duty and Virtue are intertwined and overlap in the Weltanshauung constructed by Russian literature in the 18th century. The unity of Duty and Virtue is characteristic of nearly all the historic and literary periods between 1700 and 1810. Ultimately the dialogue of ideologems of Duty and Virtue brings about a utopia of a specific state as well as personal Optimism.

How to link insert

Pashkurov, A. . (). RUSSIAN LITERATURE IN THE 18th CENTURY IN PURSUIT OF HARMONY (A SYSTEMATIC STUDY) Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", ,
References
1. Alekseeva N.Yu. Russkaya oda: Razvitie odicheskoj formy v XVII–XVIII vekax. S.-Peterburg: Nauka, 2005. 369 s.
2. Bobrik M.A. Ot racionalizma k epokhe chuvstvitel’nosti // Russian Linguistics 17. 1993. S. 37–55.
3. Borev Yu.B. Prosvetitel’skij realizm // Teoriya literatury: V 4 t. Т. 4: Literaturnyj process. Moskva: Nasledie, 2001. S. 205–211.
4. Buranok O.M. Tvorchestvo Feofana Prokopovicha i russko-zarubezhnye literaturnye svyazi pervoj poloviny XVIII veka: diss. … d-ra filol. nauk: 10.01.01, 10.01.03. Samara, 2013. 524 s.
5. Evraziya. Kul’tury, narody, religii, 2001. № 1–2.
6. Erasov B.S. Civilizacii. Universalii i samobytnost’. Moskva: Nauka, 2002. 524 s.
7. Zapadov V.A. Literaturnye napravleniya v russkoj literature XVIII veka. S.-Peterburg: Ymka-Press, 1995. 79 s.
8. Karamzin N.M. Bednaya Liza // Karamzin N.M. Povesti. Moskva: Sovetskaya Rossiya, 1979. S. 23–37.
9. Karamzin N.M. Ryczar nashego vremeny // Karamzin N.M. Povesti. Moskva: Sovetskaya Rossiya, 1979. S. 114–137.
10. Klein J. Puti kulturnogo importa. Trudy po russkoj literature XVIII veka. Moskva: Yazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury, 2005. 577 s.
11. Knyazhnin Ya.B. Vadim Novgorodskij // Knyazhnin Ya.B. Izbrannoe. Moskva: Pravda, 1991. S. 97–152.
12. Kochetkova N.D. Literatura russkogo sentimentalizma. S.-Peterburg: Nauka, 1994. 282 s.
13. Lazarchuk R.M. Literaturnaya kul’tura poslednej treti XVIII veka: Dialog stolicy i provincii: avtoreferat … d-ra filol. nauk: 10.01.01. S.-Peterburg, 2000. 55 s.
14. Lomonosov M.V. Oda blazhennya pamyati gosudaryne imperatrice Anne Ioannovne na pobedu nad turkami i tatarami i na vzyatie Xotina 1739 goda // Russkaya poeziya XVIII veka. Moskva: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1972. S. 123–130.
15. Lomonosov M.V. Oda na den’ vosshestviya na Vserossijskij prestol Yeyo Velichestva Elizavety Petrovny 1747 goda // Russkaya poeziya XVIII veka. Moskva: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1972. S. 130–136.
16. Lomonosov M.V. Oda, v kotoroj Yeyo Velichestvu blagodarenie prinositsya… // Lomonosov M.V. Stikhotvoreniya. Leningrad: Sovetskij pisatel’, 1954. S. 126–133.
17. L’vov N.A. Muzyka, ili Semitoniya // Russkaya literatura poslednej chetverti XVIII veka. Moskva: Prosveshhenie, 1985. S. 259–260.
18. Nigmatullina Yu.G. Tipy kul’tur i civilizacij v istoricheskom razvitii tatarskoj i russkoj literatur. Kazan’: Fen, 1997. 212 s.
19. Nikolaev S.I. Literaturnaya kul’tura Petrovskoj epokhi. S.-Peterburg: Dmitrij Bulanin, 1996. 151 s.
20. Orlova I.B. Evrazijskaya civilizaciya. Moskva: Norma, 1998. 275 s.
21. Pashkurov A.N. Pozdnij russkij sentimentalizm: Dialog idillicheskogo i elegicheskogo. Kazan’: Kazanskij universitet, 2010. 127 s.
22. Petrov A.V. Stanovlenie khudozhestvennogo istorizma v russkoj literature XVIII veka. Magnitogorsk: MaGU, 2006. 288 s.
23. Razzhivin A.I. “Charodejstvo krasnykh vymyslov”. Estetika russkoj predromanticheskoj poemy. Kirov: VGPU, 2001. 96 s.
24. Sazonova L.I. Literaturnaya kul’tura Rossii. Rannee Novoe vremya. Moskva: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul’tur, 2006. 904 s.
25. Smolina K.A. Russkaya tragediya. XVIII vek. Evoluciya zhanra. Moskva: Nasledie, 2001. 208 s.
26. Sumarokov A.P. Epistola o stikhotvorstve // Russkaya poeziya XVIII veka. Moskva: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1972. S. 164–178.
27. Fedoseeva T.V. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie osnovaniya literatury russkogo predromantizma. Moskva: MGOU, 2006. 158 s.
28. Junosti chestnoe zerczalo… // Domostroj. Junosti chestnoe zerczalo. S.-Peterburg: Izdatelskij dom “Azbuka-klassika”, 2008. S. 147–206.
29. Alewyn R. Das grosse Welttheater. Die Epoche der höffischen Feste. München, 1985. 320 s.
30. Barran T. Russians read Rousseau, 1762–1825. Evanston: Northwestern UP, 2002. 235 p.
31. Barrat G.B. The melancholy and the wild… // Studies in Eighteenth century. Vol. 3. Cleveland – London, 1973. P. 125–135.
32. Baudin R. Formation et poetique du roman russe au XVIII-e siecle: le systeme romanesque des annees... Paris, 2002. 315 p.
33. Dehne M. Die Legitimation der Lüge in Karamzin’s “Ilja Muromec” // Die Welt der Slaven, 2002. Bd. XVVII. S. 107–130.
34. Egeberg E. “Der Herzenszar” – die Ode zwischen Klassizismus und Romantik // Scando-Slavica, 1985. Bd. 31. S. 41–54.
35. Fagginato R. Religioznyj eklektizm v Rossii na rubezhe XVIII–XIX вв. // Study Group on eighteenth-century Russia. Newsletter. 2002. № 30. P. 49–67.
36. Ford J. Coleridge on Dreaming: Romanticism, Dreams and the Medical Imaginations. Cambridge University Press, 1998. 204 p.
37. Klein J. Trompete, Schalmei, Lyra und Fiedel. Poetologische Sinnbilder im russischen Klassizismus // Zeitschrift für slavistische Philologie, 1984. Bd. 44. S. 1–19.
38. Kotschetkova N.D., Lehmann-Carli G. Aspekte der Pietismus-Rezeption bei den Moskauer Freimaurern (1780-er Jahre). Funktionäle Kontexte und typologische Analogien // Interdisziplinäre Pietismus-forschungen, 2005. Bd. 17/2. S. 717–726.
39. Lehmann-Carli G., Schippan М., Scholz В., Brohm S. (Hrsg.). Russische Aufklärungsrezeption im Kontext offizieller Bildungskonzepte (1700–1825). Wissenschaftliche Redaktion: Birgit Scholz. Berlin: Berlin-Verlag Arno Spitz GmbH, 2001. 679 p.
40. Neuhäuser R. Periodization and classification of sentimental and preromantic trends in Russian literature between 1750 and 1815 // Canadian contributions to the seventh international Congress of Slavists. The Hague, Paris, 1973. P. 11–39.
41. Reflections on Russia in the Eighteenth Century. J. Klein, S. Dixon, M. Fraanje. Colognie; Weimar; Vienna, 2001. P. 7–18.
42. Schönle A. The Ruler in the Garden. Politics and Landscape Design in Imperial Russia. Oxford, Bern, Berlin, Bruxelles, Frankfurt am Main, New York, Wien: Peter Lang. Russian Transformations: Literature, Thoughts, Culture. Vol. 1. Series Editor: Andrew Kahn, University of Oxford, 2007. 396 p.
Download file .pdf 310.41 kb