Home Releases # 14. 2020

MEMORY NARRATIVE: A COGNITIVE-COMMUNICATIVE PERSPECTIVE

Linguistics , UDC: 81ʹ22 DOI: 10.25688/2619-0656.2020.14.10

Authors

  • Tivyaeva Irina Doctor of Philology, Docent

Annotation

Narrative as a form of organizing and structuring past experience is conventionally associated with memory. Researchers differentiate a number of memory-related narrative types, some being discrepant or ambiguous when placed in a broader context of alternative conceptions. One complicating factor contributing to the typological polyphony is the complex nature of the narrative phenomenon studied within the theoretical and methodological standards of different disciplines and thus entailing controversial interpretations. This paper seeks to clarify some aspects of the memory-narrative relationship by examining memory narrative as a language structure in the cognitive-communicative perspective. The author aims to provide a conceptual framework for the research by setting out distinctive features of memory narrative and determining its status among other narrative formats rendering mnemonic content. The findings suggest that memory narrative is a universal narrative type objectifying both personal and collective past experience and displaying specific semantic and structural properties. To support theoretical claims, relevant language data were collected and analyzed. Empirical analysis was based on four parameters that are of high significance to the cognitive-communicative paradigm: 1) the narrator parameter stating the role of the reminiscing subject in the narration, 2) the content parameter highlighting thematic dominants of the narration, 3) the communicative intention parameter indicating the narrator’s communicative goals, and 4) the axiological perception parameter demonstrating how the narrator evaluates the experience being rendered. The first parameter allowed differentiating between narrator-oriented and event-oriented narrative types, the former being registered for over two thirds of the collected language samples. In accordance with the content parameter, five communicative types of memory narrative were set out: 1) event narrative, 2) confession narrative, 3) analytical narrative, 4) didactic narrative, and 5) entertaining narrative. Empirical data suggest that the communicative types of memory narrative yielded by the research stand in correlation with its thematic dominants. Further analysis revealed that the manifested mnemonic content allows critical evaluation on the part of the narrator who can assign it the following values: 1) positive memory experience, 2) negative memory experience, 3) neutral memory experience, and 4) ambivalent memory experience. The study has shown that memory narrative functions as a specific narrative type objectifying past experience. It is characterized by thematic variation, communicative flexibility and axiological interpretability.

How to link insert

Tivyaeva, I. . (2020). MEMORY NARRATIVE: A COGNITIVE-COMMUNICATIVE PERSPECTIVE Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", # 14. 2020, 145-163. https://doi.org/10.25688/2619-0656.2020.14.10
References
1. Averina M. A. Avtobiograficheskaya proza K. V. Nazar’evoj: mezhdu real’nost’yu i mifom // Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Filologiya. Teoriya yazyka. Yazykovoe obrazovanie. 2019. No 3 (35). S. 107–112.
2. Bart R. Vvedenie v strukturnyj analiz povestvovatel’nyx tekstov // Zarubezhnaya estetika i teoriya literatury XIX–XX vv.: traktaty, stat’i, esse. Moskva: Izd-vo MGU, 1987. S. 387–422.
3. Bogdanovskaya A. B. Psikhosemanticheskoe issledovanie lichnostno-smyslovoj organizacii avtobiograficheskogo narrativa // Izvestiya Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gercena. 2012. No 153–1. S. 171–178.
4. Grejmas A. Razmyshleniya ob aktantnyx modelyax // Francuzskaya semiotika: ot strukturalizma k poststrukturalzmu. Moskva: IG Progress, 2000. S. 153–170.
5. Grejmas A.-Zh. Strukturnaya semantika: poisk metoda. Moskva: Akademicheskij proekt, 2004. 368 s.
6. Dubnyakova O. A., Kashina T. A. Kommunikativno-pragmaticheskie osobennosti lichnogo dnevnika // Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Filologiya. Teoriya yazyka. Yazykovoe obrazovanie. 2017. No 1 (25). S. 42–49.
7. Zhurdi N. V. Avtobiograficheskie teksty kak predmet grammatiki narrativa (na materiale sravnitel’nogo analiza khudozhestvennykh proizvedenij XX v.). Dis. ... kand. filol. nauk, 10.02.20. Moskva: MGU im. M. V. Lomonosova, 2010. 176 s.
8. Lakoff Dzh., Dzhonson M. Metafory, kotorymi my zhivem. Moskva: URSS Editorial, 2004. 256 s.
9. Lingvistika i aksiologiya. Etnosemiometriya cennostnykh smyslov / Serebrennikova E. F., Antip’ev N. P., Ladygin Yu.A., Malinovich Yu.M., Plotnikova S. N., Tareva E. G. i dr. Kollektivnaya monografiya. Moskva: Tezaurus, 2011. 352 s.
10. Nersesova E. V. Koncepciya obraza povestvovatelya v rannikh proizvedeniyakh Genri Dzhejmsa // Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Filologiya. Teoriya yazyka. Yazykovoe obrazovanie. 2018. No 3(31). S. 8–13.
11. Novikov A. I. Tekst, smysl i problemnaya situaciya // Voprosy filologii. 1999. No 3. S. 43–48.
12. Nyubina L. M. Fragmentarnost’ avtobiograficheskogo narrativa v diskurse vspominayushhej lichnosti // Izvestiya Smolenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2011. No 4. S. 181–193.
13. Oshchepkova V. V., Tivyaeva I. V. Pamyat’ i temporal’nost’ vyskazyvaniya // Psycholinguistics. 2019. No 26–2. S. 296–320.
14. Perekhodceva O. V. Pamyat’ i narrativ v sovremennoj anglijskoj literature: M. Emis i Dzh. Barns: Dis. ... kand. filol. nauk, 10.01.03. Saratov, 2013. 217 s.
15. Plotnikova S. N. Kollektivnaya kogniciya i ee rol’ v konstruirovanii social’nogo mira // Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka. 2017. Vyp. XXX. S. 696–699.
16. Plotnikova S. N. Rol’ interpretiruyushhego diskursa v organizacii kommunikativnogo soobshhestva // Rusistika i komparativistika. Vyp. XIII. Moskva: Knigodel, 2019. S. 304–315.
17. Propp V. Morfologiya skazki. Leningrad: Academia, 1928 URL: http://feb-web.ru/feb/skazki/critics/pms/PMS-001-.htm.
18. Radbil’ T. B. Kommunikativno-kognitivnaya teoriya narrativa v sovremennoj lingvopoetike // Magiya INNO: novye izmereniya v lingvistike i lingvodidaktike. Moskva: Moskovskij gosudarstvennyj institut mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenij, S. 126–131.
19. Sapogova E. E. Avtobiograficheskij narrativ v kontekste kul’turno-istoricheskoj psikhologii // Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya. 2005. No 2. S. 63–74.
20. Suleymanova O. A. Semanticheskaya rol’ implicitnogo nablyudatelya v modeli predlozheniya // Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Filologiya. Teoriya yazyka. Yazykovoe obrazovanie. 2015. No 3(19). S. 69–75.
21. Tivyaeva I. V. Kategoriya pamyati kak objekt issledovaniya v lingvistike // Aktual’nyye problemy lingvistiki i lingvodidakticheskiye aspekty professional’noj podgotovki perevodchikov. Materialy II nauchno-prakticheskoj internet-konferencii c mezhdunarodnym uchastiem. 2013. S. 125–134.
22. Tivyaeva I. V. Fiksaciya i translyaciya individual’noj pamyati sredstvami estestvennogo yazyka. Moskva: Flinta: Nauka, 2018. 224 s.
23. Tivyaeva I. V. Strukturnaya organizaciya mnemicheskogo narrativa // Sibirskii filologicheskii zhurnal. 2020. No 1. S. 303–315.
24. Tul’chinskij G. L. Skriptizaciya personologicheskogo bytiya // Chelovek.ru. No 14. S. 75–87.
25. Tyupa V. I. Narratologiya kak analitika povestvovatel’nogo diskursa. Tver’: Tverskoj gosudarstvennyj universitet, 2001. 58 s.
26. Shmid V. Narratologiya. Moskva: Yazyki slavyanskoj kul’tury, 2003. 312 s.
27. Brockmeier Jens. Beyond the Archive: Memory, Narrative, and the Autobiographical Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. 401 s.
28. Bruner J. The narrative construction of reality // Critical Inquiry. 1991. Vol. 18 (1). P. 1–21 URL: http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/448619.
29. Conway M. A., Rubin D. C. The structure of autobiographical memory. In A. F. Collins, S. E. Gathercole, M. A. Conway, P. E. Morris (Eds.). Theories of memory. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1993. P. 103–139.
30. Hill B. Letterman After 9/11: Seeking Normal // Huffpost URL: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/letterman-after-911-seeking-normal_n_954322.
31. Labov W., Waletzky J. Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience // Helm J. (Ed.) Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts. Proceeding of the 1966 Annual Spring Meeting of the American Ethnological Society. Seattle, London: University of Washington Press, 1966. P. 12–44.
32. Léon Carlos. An architecture of narrative memory. Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures, 2016. Vol. 16. P. 19–33.
33. Nelson K., Fivush R. The Emergence of Autobiographical Memory: A Social Cultural Development Theory. Psychological Review, 2004. Vol. 111. No 2. P. 486–511.
34. Obama B. Holocaust Days of Remembrance Commemoration Address // American Rhetoric URL: https://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/barackobama/barackobamaholocaustdaysofremembrance.htm.
35. Powell C. McConnell Center Address on U. S. Role in Arab-Israeli Conflict // American Rhetoric URL: https://americanrhetoric.com/speeches/cpowell11-19-01.htm.
36. Schank R. C., Abelson R. P. Knowledge and Memory: The Real Story // Robert S. Wyer, Jr (ed.). Knowledge and Memory: The Real Story. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1995. P. 1–85.
37. Scilaz N. Towards narrative-based knowledge representation in cognitive systems. In Proceeding of the 6 th workshop on computational models of narrative (CMN’15), 2015. P. 133–141.
38. Tivyaeva I. Representation of retrospective memory and communicative context. Jezikoslovlje. 2014. Vol. 15 (2–3). P. 283–306.
Download file .pdf 112.2 kb